Selling You Snake Oil – How Generative AI is Revolutionizing Advertising
Generative AI promises advertisers infinite customized ads and soaring conversion rates. But its uncanny ability to subtly deceive also raises pressing ethical questions we’ve only begun to grapple with. As these ghost-in-the-machine tools infiltrate marketing, how can consumers identify what’s real amidst AI-conjured fantasy worlds – and how can advertisers walk the line between innovation and integrity?
Key Points
- Leading platforms like Amazon and Meta now offer AI ad generators promising more clicks and sales
- AI scenes often have minor defects revealing their simulated nature upon close inspection
- Visual trickery could misrepresent products’ real-world scale and contexts
- Tips for both identifying AI ads as a consumer and deploying the tech responsibly as a marketer
Generative AI tools that can automatically create product images, ad copy, and more are sending shockwaves through the advertising world. Major platforms like Amazon, Meta, Google, and TikTok now offer AI services to advertisers promising more personalized and higher-performing campaigns. However, these nascent technologies raise ethical questions around truth in advertising and could disrupt professions like photography.
Advertisers are eagerly embracing AI tools to pump out infinite customized ads, enticed by promises of boosted clicks and sales compared to standard static ads. For example, Amazon claims its ad generator leads to a 40% higher click-through rate by letting brands create simulated environments featuring their products. The ease of generating endless staged product configs and backgrounds is undoubtedly more efficient than shooting traditional photography.
But speed and scale come at the cost of authenticity. AI-generated scenes often appear obviously synthetic to the human eye. And visual trickery could mislead consumers about products’ real-world scale and context. If you see a cutting board triple the size of the knife displayed on it, does that change your perception of the knife’s size? As AI image quality improves, its ability to subtly deceive also increases.
While photography as a profession won’t disappear – brands still need some legitimate reference imagery – the volume of work required could plummet. A single 3D product model can spawn infinite synthesized scenes on demand. And copywriters could face displacement from AI marketing assistants pumping out endless personalized ad headline variants as well.
Tips for Consumers
- Look closely at product details and backgrounds – subtle oddities like distorted textures, shadows not matching light sources, or abnormal reflections can signal an AI-generated image.
- Reverse image search using Google Images to check if the same stock image shows up in multiple places. AI generators often pull elements from existing databases.
- Check that scale relationships make sense, like relative product and model sizes. Warped proportions are a giveaway.
- Watch for generic overly smooth faces and expressions that lack authentic human details.
- See if multiple versions or views of the same product exist. AI generators often produce single prototype images.
Tips for Advertisers
- Label AI-generated imagery to not mislead people it is real – don’t present it as regular photography.
- Audit image generation datasets to avoid baked-in biases being embedded unconsciously.
- Establish ethical creative guidelines aligned to truth in advertising standards before deploying AI generators en masse.
- Add light watermarking to flag AI content and deter potential misuse of synthesized images outside approved contexts.
- Use real product photos alongside AI extrapolations to make capabilities clear, not replace authentic assets entirely.
The advertising world’s embrace of generative AI amounts to essentially industrial-scale deception machinery with public health implications when used to promote products like junk food or pharmaceuticals. Regulators have yet to catch up. And average consumers lack the savvy to discern AI-generated ads from real ones as the technology advances. For now, viewing any too-good-to-be-true advertising imagery with skepticism is advised in this emerging Wild West era of computer-conjured marketing.
Regulation lags behind AI advertising’s rapid emergence. And the public lacks the awareness to parse fake from real as the tech improves. By balancing guidelines and accountability with innovation, perhaps we can reap benefits without unintended consequences. But for now, a healthy dose of scrutiny is warranted for this new breed of computer-crafted marketing.
The snake oil salesmen of yesterday could only have dreamed of such a tool.